Research
| Publications
| Resources
| CV
| Drawings
| Links
| Disclaimer
Research Interests
|
Mechanisms of Gene Regulation
Our group's overall goal in this area is to elucidate mechanisms of gene regulation. In particular,
we are interested in understanding how transcription regulators and chromatin modifications regulate gene expression
programs during cellular development and differentiation. Currently, we are focused on developing and
applying experimental and computational approaches to map and characterize
regulatory elements and epigenomes in human and mouse embryonic/hematopoietic stem cells, T cells, and cancer cells.
Systems Biology of Gene Regulation
To understand differential cell-fate outcome in response to the same uniform
stimulus, we are exploring the link between regulatory network architecture and the genome-scale dynamics
of the underlying entities (genes, mRNAs, and proteins). Recently, we found that at the protein level, the
top-layer TFs (which trigger/initiate regulatory cascades) are relatively abundant, long-lived, and showed more
cell-to-cell variability (noise) compared to the downstream (core- and bottom-layer) TFs. This and other results
led us to conclude that the variability in expression of top-layer TFs might confer a selective advantage, as
this may permit at least some members in a clonal cell population to initiate an effective response to
fluctuating environments, whereas the tight regulation of the core- and bottom-layer TFs may minimize noise
propagation and ensure fidelity in regulation. The dynamic variability in expression level of key regulatory
proteins could permit differential sampling (i.e.,the survival network or the apoptotic network) of the same
underlying regulatory network (governing all cells) by different members in a clonal population, which might
result in divergent cell-fate outcomes among different individuals in an otherwise identical cell population.
This result is critical to understanding phenotypic variability in fluctuating environments, e.g., fractional survival
or cell-death in clonal cell populations upon drug treatment in diseases such as cancer. Our current research in
this area is focused on identifying additional evidence support this notion, and understanding how cells adapt
to changing environments, how different phenotypic outcomes are mediated in clonal cell populations, and how
mutations that disrupt the dynamics of key regulatory proteins may influence disease conditions.
|
Regulated stages of gene expression
|
Keywords
Chromatin,
Functional Genomics,
Epigenetics,
Gene & Protein Networks,
Self-renewal and Pluripotency of Embryonic and Hemetapoietic Stem Cells,
Development of Genomics and Bioinformatics tools
Collaborators (in alphabetical order)
Dr. Sunita K Agarwal NIDDK, NIH |
Regulatory role of tumor suppressor gene MEN1 in endocrine cells and neoplasia |
Dr. L. Aravind NCBI, NIH |
Protein/Genome evolution |
Dr. M. Madan Babu MRC-LMB, Cambridge |
Gene regulatory networks |
Prof. Gerald R Crabtree HHMI & Stanford University |
Role of esBAF complexes in mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency |
Dr. Guang Hu NIEHS, NIH |
Identification of novel genes essential for embryonic stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency |
Dr. Paul E Love NICHD, NIH |
Role of Ldb1 in T cell development and Erythropoiesis |
Dr. Michael Resnick NIEHS, NIH |
p53 tumor suppressor master regulatory network |
Dr. Jack A Taylor NIEHS, NIH |
miRNA expression in relation to early detection of breast cancer |
Dr. Paul A Wade NIEHS, NIH |
Mechanisms of gene regulation by REST/NRSF |
Prof. Hai-Hui Xue University of Iowa |
Role of GABP complex in hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and long-term survival |
Dr. Keji Zhao NHLBI, NIH |
Identification of tissue specific gene regulatory elements |
Selected Publications
[ Complete List ]
[ Pubmed ]
[ DBLP ]
- * indicates corresponding author
|
Shuyang Yu , Dong-Mei Zhao, Raja Jothi, and Hai-Hui Xue*.
Critical requirement of GABPα for normal T cell development.
Journal of Biological Chemistry, in press.
[Pubmed] [PDF] [Text] |
|
Mei Liu, Xue-Wen Chen, Raja Jothi.
Knowledge-Guided Inference of Domain-Domain Interactions from Incomplete Protein-Protein Interaction Networks.
Bioinformatics, 25: 2492-2499, 2009.
[Pubmed]
[PDF]
[Text] |
|
Raja Jothi1,*, S Balaji1, Arthur Wuster, Joshua A Grochow, Jorg Gsponer,
Teresa M Przytycka, L Aravind, and M Madan Babu*.
Genomic analysis reveals a tight link between transcription factor dynamics and regulatory network architecture.
Molecular Systems Biology, 5:294, 2009. (1Co-first authors)
[Pubmed]
[PDF]
[Text] |
|
Artem Barski1, Raja Jothi1, Suresh Cuddapah1, Kairong Cui,
Tae-Young Roh, Dustin E Schones, and Keji Zhao*.
Chromatin Poises miRNA and Protein-coding Genes for Expression.
Genome Research, 19(10):1742-1751, 2009. (1Co-first authors)
[Pubmed]
[PDF]
[Text]
[Cover page] |
|
Eric Kallin, Ru Cao, Raja Jothi, Kai Xia, Kairong Cui,
Keji Zhao, and Yi Zhang*.
Genome wide uH2A localization analysis highlights Bmi1-dependent deposition of the mark at repressed genes.
PLoS Genetics, Jun;5(6):e1000506, 2009.
[Pubmed]
[PDF]
[Text] |
|
Lena Ho1, Raja Jothi1, Jehnna L Ronan, Kairong Cui,
Keji Zhao, and Gerald R Crabtree*.
An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex esBAF is an
essential component of the core pluripotency transcriptional network.
Proc Natl Acad of Sci (PNAS), 106(13):5187-5191, 2009 (1Co-first authors)
[Pubmed]
[PDF]
[Text]
|
Suresh Cuddapah1,Raja Jothi1, Dustin E Schones, Tae-Young Roe, Kairong Cui, and Keji Zhao*.
Global analysis of the insulator binding protein CTCF in chromatin barrier regions reveals demarcation
of active and repressive domains. Genome Research, 19(1):24-32, 2009. (1Co-first authors)
[Pubmed]
[Text]
[PDF]
|
|
Raja Jothi, Suresh Cuddapah, Artem Barski, Kairong Cui, and
Keji Zhao*. Genome-wide identification
of in vivo protein-DNA binding sites from ChIP-Seq data.
Nucleic Acids Research, 36(16):5221-31, 2008.
[Pubmed]
[PDF]
[Text]
[Download SISSRs]
[Citations] |
Balaji Raghavachari, Asba Tasneem, Teresa M. Przytycka, and Raja Jothi*.
DOMINE: a database of protein domain interactions.
Nucleic Acids Research, 36(Database issue):D656-61, 2008.
[Pubmed]
[PDF]
[Text]
[Database Website]
[Citations] |
Raja Jothi*, Praveen F Cherukuri, Asba Tasneem, and Teresa M Przytycka*.
Co-evolutionary analysis of domains in interacting proteins reveals insights into
domain-domain interactions mediating protein-protein interactions.
Journal of Molecular Biology, 362(4), 861-875, 2006.
[Pubmed]
[PDF]
[Text]
[Supplementary Material]
[Citations]
 |
|
|
Resources
-
SISSRs
- Genome-wide identification of in vivo
protein-DNA interactions from ChIP-Seq data
-
DOMINE
- A database of protein domain interactions
-
RCDP
- Performs co-evolutionary analysis of domains
in interacting proteins to predict domain pair(s) that is most likely
mediating a given protein-protein interaction
-
COCO-CL -
Identifies orthologous set of genes. Can also be used to perform
hierarchical clustering of orthologous (or homologous) genes to identify
out-paralogs from automatically generated set of ortholgous genes (eg:
COGs).
-
MORPH - Predicts
protein interaction partners between members of two protein families
that are known to interact (for example: Ligands and Receptors).
Some Links
Puzzles to solve
How to
write proofs
Journey
of Man
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed on this website do not state or
reflect those of the U.S. Government, DHHS, NIH, or NIEHS.
This file was last updated on Jan 29, 2010.
|